HAS NO IDEA WHAT THE
CONSTITUTION
IS ALL ABOUT
AND COULD CARE LESS
Long before The Geneva Conventions, it was
generally agreed among nations that:
@ Men at war are required to wear uniforms,
carry their weapons openly,
@ be part of a regular armed force, and
not intentionally target civilians.
Wartime powers and priveledges were defined thus:
@ Enemy combatants may be captured and
held until the end of hostilities.
@ Soldiers who adhere to the laws of war shall
be entitled certain protections.
@ Non-uniformed terrorists who target civilians
are unlawful combatants.
@ They are not entitled to the same and may be
prosecuted by a military commission
for war crimes
The peace treaty at New Orleans decreed that:
"In the state of war, civilian courts are inadequate...."
in Moyer vs Peabody the Supreme Court affirmed:
"Public danger warrents the substitution of
executive process for judicial process."
The long and short of it is that:
A free, selfgoverning people
does not surrender control of decisions concerning
national defense - to officials who are not politically
accountable. We must reject the idea of entrusting
our security to judicial processes or we shall eventually
find ourselves neither secure nor free.
No comments:
Post a Comment