Wednesday, April 28, 2010

The Protocals of War

HAS NO IDEA WHAT THE
CONSTITUTION
 IS ALL ABOUT
AND COULD CARE LESS


Long before The Geneva Conventions, it was
generally agreed among nations that:
@   Men at war are required to wear uniforms,
         carry their weapons openly,
@   be part of a regular armed force, and
         not intentionally target civilians.

Wartime powers and priveledges were defined thus:
@    Enemy combatants may be captured and
          held until the end of hostilities.
@    Soldiers who adhere to the laws of war shall
          be entitled certain protections.
@    Non-uniformed terrorists who target civilians
          are unlawful combatants.
@    They are not entitled to the same and may be
           prosecuted by a military commission
           for war crimes

The peace treaty at New Orleans decreed that:
      "In the state of war, civilian courts are inadequate...." 

in Moyer vs Peabody the Supreme Court affirmed:
      "Public danger warrents the substitution of
             executive process for judicial process."

The long and short of it is that:
A free, selfgoverning people
does not surrender control of decisions concerning
national defense - to officials who are not politically
accountable. We must reject the idea of entrusting
our security to judicial processes or we shall eventually
find ourselves neither secure nor free.

No comments:

Post a Comment